Another Piece of Evidence Confirms the Obvious: Mask Mandates and Lockdowns in the US Were Completely Ineffective
Yet experts and the media still defend them
The prolific promotion of COVID policy interventions by the media has unfortunately had astonishing consequences.
There’s been an undeniable surge in mental health issues, with teenagers and children especially affected.
Many spent their remaining years of junior or high school lives stuck locked away by needlessly terrified adults. Others were forced to miss out on the formative years of early education or the start of their time in college.
Vaccine mandates eliminated the once sacred freedom of choice, with the media and expert messaging gaslighting the public into accepting the forced compliance with mandates or be fired as a reasonable, defensible trade off.
Discriminatory policies have and will continue to have long-lasting consequences. Societal disruption, a collapse in economic health and success, and of course, the substantial portion of the population who will never move on from masks and boosters.
Media outlets continue to this day to refuse to accept the disturbing consequences of their actions, deciding instead to continuously mislead their readers, with the intellectual implications of their actions seemingly making it impossible for them to ever relent.
But what makes this so much worse is that a growing body of evidence is confirming that none of it was remotely effective. This is despite the information shared by researchers trying desperately to defend mandates.
Their own work, however, is detailed evidence that when comparing states by mask mandates, lockdowns, and even political orientation, there’s no difference. Even when stacking the deck.
Unmasked is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial