CDC Is Still Putting Out Garbage 'Research' To Support Their COVID Agenda

mRNA Vaccines Must Be Promoted

It should come as no surprise that the national news media is having a collective meltdown over the significant job cuts at the CDC and other top domestic public health institutions. The CDC, as has been obvious to most objective outside observers over the past decade, has, like so many other institutions, revamped itself as an organization dedicated to promoting a specific agenda.

This manifested itself before, during, and after the pandemic as evidenced by how the CDC operated, its recommendations, its word choices, and the research they chose to publish. By now the CDC’s well-documented scroll of failures and misinformation could fill a book. Several books.

They flip-flopped on masks, with no new supporting research. Then funded low quality research, including a phone survey, to justify masking. Even worse, they then highlighted non-statistically significant results because it supported that agenda. Essentially scientific malpractice, churned out by the supposedly objective institution.

Of course, the former head of the CDC, Rochelle Walensky, infamously claimed on television that CDC data showed vaccinated individuals did not get sick from COVID and did not spread it to others. This would prove to be a completely inaccurate fabrication for which she faced no criticism or calls for accountability.

As 'Mask Mandate Season' Approaches, We Learn The CDC Knew Masks Didn’t Work And Misrepresented The Evidence Anyway

There's a laundry list of problematic issues with the CDC, from using "birthing person" and "chestfeeding" in communications, to ignoring high-quality evidence that contradicts their preferred viewpoints. And just because the pandemic is over does not mean the CDC's poor work is over. Far from it.