Facts Be Damned: A New Journal Article Claims That Accurate COVID Information On Masks And Vaccines Is 'Misinformation'

Laundering inaccurate opinions through journals to advocate for censorship

Debates over what qualifies as “misinformation” have intensified over the past few years, particularly as a result of governments and their associated “experts” continuing to get virtually every major COVID question wrong.

Efforts from politically motivated researches to protect preferred narratives and those who propagated them have grown increasingly desperate. Rather than accepting verifiable evidence and reassessing conclusions based on new findings, most “experts” have remained determined to protect their professions, despite long overdue acknowledgements by global governments on their COVID policy failures.

But a new release from JAMA might be the most offensive example yet of researchers attempting to disqualify differing opinions. A so-called “Original Investigation” claims to show that scientists and physicians used social media to disseminate “misinformation.”

Except the “investigation” contains any number of inaccurate claims, disproven beliefs, and offensive conclusions.