Facts Be Damned: A New Journal Article Claims That Accurate COVID Information On Masks And Vaccines Is 'Misinformation'
Laundering inaccurate opinions through journals to advocate for censorship
Debates over what qualifies as “misinformation” have intensified over the past few years, particularly as a result of governments and their associated “experts” continuing to get virtually every major COVID question wrong.
Efforts from politically motivated researches to protect preferred narratives and those who propagated them have grown increasingly desperate. Rather than accepting verifiable evidence and reassessing conclusions based on new findings, most “experts” have remained determined to protect their professions, despite long overdue acknowledgements by global governments on their COVID policy failures.
Well Look Who Finally Caught Up: Government Reports Now Acknowledge The Lack Of Evidence Behind COVID Mandates
The behavior of global governments during the pandemic was overwhelmingly geared towards panic. Across the world, from the United States to Europe to Asia, misinformation, poor analysis, panic and politicization led “experts” to advise politicians to frequently make world changing policies based on nonexistent evidence.
But a new release from JAMA might be the most offensive example yet of researchers attempting to disqualify differing opinions. A so-called “Original Investigation” claims to show that scientists and physicians used social media to disseminate “misinformation.”
Except the “investigation” contains any number of inaccurate claims, disproven beliefs, and offensive conclusions.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Unmasked to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.