Texas Sues Pfizer For Misrepresenting COVID Vaccine Claims, Censoring Americans Who Criticized Them
About time that Pfizer finally faces some consequences
The question of COVID vaccine efficacy has been one of the most important of the past few years, as world changing policy and the rapid proliferation of vaccine mandates and passports relied on data showing the effectiveness - or ineffectiveness - of the mRNA vaccines.
The CDC And Dr. Fauci Knew The Truth About Vaccine Effectiveness Yet Pushed For Mandates Anyway
Former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky has undoubtedly been an underrated contributor to the rapid proliferation of misinformation and harmful policies during the second half of the pandemic. Rightfully, the focus is often on Dr. Anthony Fauci, whose advocacy, authoritarian impulses and relentless incompetence helped ensure masks would become a semi-permanent part of every day life, despite knowing that there was no evidence they were substantively effective.
And the efficacy of those vaccines were initially relayed and determined by the manufacturers themselves, with announcements from Pfizer publicly claiming that their products were overwhelmingly effective. Those initial estimates however, may finally be coming back to bite them.
All thanks to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Unmasked to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.