There's Finally Been A Major Change in COVID Vaccine Recommendations In The US
Evidence-based medicine makes a comeback
COVID vaccine recommendations are finally set to reflect reality, science, and data after years of ignoring conclusive evidence in favor of politically-motivated posturing.
That's not hyperbole; it's quite literally exactly what happened under previous administrators within the FDA or the other health agencies. Dr. Peter Marks, one of the top former decision makers at the FDA, for example, essentially admitted in testimony before Congress that he decided on a target date for the initial full approval of COVID vaccines based on his own personal panic over new variants and inaccurate expectations.
In 2024, Rep. James Comer asked Marks about that process along with his decision to remove doctors who disagreed with his rushed, fear-driven process: "So why were you pressuring the doctors, and then removing them from the approval process when they disagreed?"
"The approvals process was one that needed to move as rapidly as possible," Marks said.
“The experts” in a nutshell.
Why did it need to move so rapidly? Marks' answer to that manages to be even worse. And that attitude, thankfully, is no longer part of the FDA.
READ THE LATEST:
Biden Administration, Health Officials Purposefully and Disturbingly Delayed Publicly Acknowledging Risks Of COVID Vaccine Side Effects
The Biden administration was so desperate to persuade the public to believe that every single person in America should receive the COVID vaccine that it may have purposefully delayed acknowledging very real vaccine-caused side effects for several months.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Unmasked to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.